Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

None appears on behalf of the opposite party. Accordingly, the revisional application is taken up for hearing.

This application is at the instance of the petitioner and it is filed for expeditious disposal of the Misc. Case being Misc. Case No. 259 of 2006 arising out of the Title Execution Case No. 168 of 2006.

The short fact is that the petitioner/decree-holder got a decree for recovery of possession against the predecessor-in-interest of the opposite party/Register. The decree was put into execution by launching the ejectment Execution Case no. 168 of 2006. That application for execution is pending since 2006. In the meantime, the opposite party filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. That application is also pending for a considerable time. As a result, the execution case has been hauled up. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that intervention of this court is necessary for expeditious disposal of the execution case. Accordingly, this revisional application is disposed of by passing the following orders:-