Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: khasra pahani in Khaja Naseeruddin vs The Govt. Of A.P. on 28 September, 2021Matching Fragments
12. The entries in Khasra Pahani were corrected accordingly.
13. The orders passed by Nizam Atiyat in F.No.855 dt.26.11.1964 would also establish that the schedule lands are Inam Lands belonging to Khaja Jalal.
14. Mutation was effected in the year 1968 and Faisal Patti was prepared in the year 1968-69 i.e., Thakta 5-6-7 and Tahsildar fixed the revenue payable for the Khaja Jalal Maqtha (Inam) in F.No.A1/4512/68 dt.28.09.1968.
15. The Wasoolbaqui, Sethwar, Khasra Pahani, Chesala Pahani would also establish that the land granted to Khaja Jalal was a Panmaqtha Inam.
31. After remand, the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy, Dr.M.Jagan Mohan held that the land is Panmaqta Inam Land; that the lands are not Kancha Lands but agriculture lands; that the word 'Bonthala Kancha' mentioned in the Khasra Pahani of 1954-55 referring to these lands is the name of the field and not a Kancha Land as held by his predecessor Joint Collector V.Seshadri. He also referred to the earlier orders of Joint Collector (V.Seshadri) and held that that it was rightly held that P.Sunanda and others (auction purchasers) are not entitled for ORC; and like-wise, Kottakapu Sai Reddy and others are not entitled for any ORC. Having held so, the matter was further remanded to the Revenue Divisional Officer to conduct de-novo enquiry with regard to cultivation and possession as on 01.11.1973 vide proceedings No.F1/2079/2009 dt.05.12.2009 (page Nos.114 to 121 of Volume I-B).
(a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 4 of the Act which prohibits grant of such Certificates for grazing lands. He referred to the Khasra Pahani of 1954-55 which used the words 'Bontala Kancha' under the heading 'Field Name' and also Chesala Pahani which mentioned them to be 'Kancha Lands' and said that the columns in these documents indicated that the land is not under cultivation, and so it can be safely concluded that they are used for grazing purposes, and were not under cultivation in 1955 when the Act was passed.
(iv) The Revenue Divisional Officer also stated that in 1957, a dispute arose between the legal heirs of late Khaja Meeran and Khaja Moinuddin and others regarding correction of names and fixation of shares relating to the said land in the Khasra Pahani; on 22.08.1957, Smt.Azeez Bee, Smt.Banu Bee and Abdur Rehman applied for correction of entries in the Khasra Pahani; it was decided by the Naib Tahsildar / Deputy Tahsildar after taking evidence; and corrections were made in orders passed on 28.05.1958 in F.No.40/86/57. It is HAC,J & TA,J ::57:: wa_540_2007&batch stated that the shares were fixed in respect of 1/3rd share enjoyed by Khaja Meeran as follows: