Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Electronics Testing in Narinder Aggarwal vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd on 18 March, 2011Matching Fragments
3. The counsel for the respondent appearing on advance notice has contended that its laboratory has also been accredited by the NABL and documents in which regard have been produced in other matters. He seeks time to produce the same.
4. The counsel for the petitioner has fairly handed over in the Court an accreditation letter qua the laboratory of the respondent but contends that the said accreditation is not for assessment relating to theft.
5. It has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioner as to whether accreditation granted by NABL to Electronic Regional Test Laboratory (North) and Central Power Research Institute (CPRI) is different from the accreditation granted to the laboratory of the respondent.