Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: indian penal code section 353 in State vs (1) Mohd. Julfikar on 25 March, 2011Matching Fragments
44. DW-2 Ms. Parveen is oblivious on all important facts. The incident had taken place where her mother-in-law Jameela (now deceased) was arrested from the spot. Police officials had also sustained injuries. She despite being the daughter-in-law of Jameela does not know anything about this case. This is highly unbelievable. This witness also cannot be relied upon and does not inspire any confidence.
45. Accordingly, as per the discussion above, I am of the opinion that the prosecution has succeeded in proving offences punishable U/s 147 read with Section 149 IPC, U/s 353 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, and U/s 323 read with Section 149 IPC against accused persons namely Shakeel, Akil, Bhoora and Raju @ Mohd. Zarif and offence punishable U/s 148 IPC against accused Bhoora beyond reasonable doubt. Accused Shakeel, Akil, Bhoora and Raju @ Mohd. Zarif are accordingly convicted for these offences.
Report of probation officer seen. It is reported by Probation Officer that convict Aakil was not having any previous involvement in any criminal case. He is not a habitual offender. The probation officer has also recommended that there is likelihood of reformation of convict, if released on probation.
FIR No. 440/2004, PS : Khajuri Khas, Delhi Page 32 of 43 33In this case the convict has been found guilty of obstructing the public servant in carrying out his duty, committing rioting and being the member of unlawful assembly and causing simple hurt. Convict has been convicted U/s 147 read with Section 149 IPC, U/s 353 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and U/s 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC Ld. Addl. P.P for the State has submitted that convict does not deserve any leniency.
Report of probation officer seen. It is reported by Probation Officer that convict Bhoora was not having any previous involvement in any criminal case. He is not a habitual offender. The probation officer has also recommended that there is likelihood of reformation of convict, if released on probation.
FIR No. 440/2004, PS : Khajuri Khas, Delhi Page 35 of 43 36In this case the convict has been found guilty of obstructing the public servant in carrying out his duty, committing rioting and being the member of unlawful assembly and causing simple hurt. Convict has been convicted U/s 147 read with Section 149 IPC, U/s 353 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and U/s 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and U/s 148 IPC.
Report of probation officer seen. It is reported by Probation Officer that convict Raju @ Mohd. Zarif was not having any previous involvement in any criminal case. He is not a habitual offender. The probation officer has also recommended that there is likelihood of reformation of convict, if released on probation.
In this case the convict has been found guilty of obstructing the public servant in carrying out his duty, committing rioting and being the member of unlawful assembly and causing simple hurt. Convict has been convicted U/s 147 read with Section 149 IPC, U/s 353 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and U/s 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC Ld. Addl. P.P for the State has submitted that convict does not deserve any leniency.