Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

what it actually decides, and not what logically follows from it. The court should not place reliance on decisions without discussing as to how the factual situation fits in with the fact-situation of the decision on which reliance is placed. {Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, (2014) 5 SCC 75 (Para-47)}

18. While appreciating several decisions cited at the Bar or as we have ourselves researched, we have kept the same in mind.

Vishwanath Chaturvedi & others, (2013) 2 SCC 1 (Para-1) (Two-Judge Bench); and Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, (2014) 5 SCC 75 (Para-

52) (Two-Judge Bench)}.

(vii) Error apparent is not which has to be fished out and searched. It must be an error of inadvertence. The power of review can be exercised for correction of a mistake but not to substitute a view. The mere possibility of two views on the subject is not a ground for review. {(Lily Thomas (supra) (Para-58)}.