Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAJSAMAND in M/S S.A.S. R.K. Marble Udhyog vs Shree Pustimargiya Tritiya ... on 3 January, 2025Matching Fragments
Order 03/01/2025
1. The present four revision petitions arise out of the same cause of action and hence, were heard together and are being decided by this common order.
2. The revision petitions have been preferred against the order dated 06.07.2023 passed by the Civil Judge, Rajsamand in Civil Original Suit Nos.42/2023, 43/2023, 44/2023 & 45/2023 respectively whereby the applications under Order VII Rule 11 r.w. Section 9, CPC r.w. Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') as filed on behalf of defendant No.1 have been rejected and the suits in question have been held to be maintainable before a Civil Court.