Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
4. In our opinion the correct law was laid down in Ram Rup v. Naik Ram, AIR 1926 All 252. It is well established that when an appeal is filed in a wrong Court and is therefore taker) back, it must be presented to the proper Court as speedily as possible. There is no reason for applying a different rule to a case where prior to the presentation of an appeal, the appellant was engaged unsuccessfully in review proceedings. As soon as the review is rejected, the appeal must be filed without delay and if there is any delay it must be duly accounted for. When extension of limitation is prayed for under section 5 on a ground analogous to that provided under Section 14, it is imperative that the party asking for the indulgence must explain the delay which has taken place between the termination of the period sought to be excluded and the presentation of the appeal.