Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Arbitrary marks in Choda Bhutia And Ors vs State Of Sikkim And Ors on 23 March, 2020Matching Fragments
18. In Dr. Anita Puri (supra), one of the questions that had fallen for consideration was whether sub-division of marks by the Public Service Commission on different facets and awarding only 2½ marks for higher qualification can be said to be arbitrary? This question has not fallen for consideration in this case as it is not the case of any of the parties that any mark on account of weightage for higher qualification was earmarked.
19. In Maharashtra State Road Transport Corpn. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the rules of the game, meaning thereby, the criteria for selection cannot be altered by the authorities concerned in the middle or after the selection process has commenced.