Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. The defendant filed objections, contending that the police help cannot be ordered to implement the orders of injunction and if there is any violation, the proper remedy of the plaintiff is to move the Court under O. 39, R. 2A and Court has no jurisdiction to order police protection. The defendant's objection was overruled and the trial Court passed an order directing the P.S.I. Anekal to assist the plaintiff in implementing and enforcing the orders passed by that Court on I.A.I. application for temporary injunction. The defendant has challenged the same.