Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: document lost in Antony Cardoza vs State Of Kerala on 18 March, 2011Matching Fragments
32. It has come out from the evidence that PW2 was giving evidence in respect of Ext.P1 and its contents was not able to produce the original. It is also come out from the evidence of the Investigating Officer and that of PW6 that the said letter was not available. Therefore, in cases where the original of a letter or a document lost or destroyed and if original cannot produced, secondary evidence may be given, of the existence, condition or contents of a document. The requirements of Section 65(c) are made out in this case so as to admit Ext.P1 as secondary evidence.