Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

13.4. As provided by Section 64 of the Evidence Act, documents must be proved by primary evidence, except in cases secondary evidence relating to documents may be given, as provided in the Act. Primary evidence would mean the document itself, which is required to be produced for inspection of the Court for proving the same. An original Will would be a document, which is required to be produced before the Court as primary evidence for proving it. There is no legal requirement of either preparing a draft before finalising a document or of producing a draft along with the original document, which is to be proved by primary evidence. Therefore, when the document itself is produced and sought to be proved, the proof of such document would not depend upon the existence or nonexislence or production or non-production of a draft of such document, which may have preceded its execution. Therefore, non-production of the draft of the Will, if any, by the propounders cannot be described as a suspicious circumstances. The propounder Kesuprasad Jani has admitted in his deposition that the Will was drafted by Advocate, late Shri D. A. Mehta, Obviously, therefore, this witness cannot be expected to say as to from whom late Shri D. A. Mehta had got the draft of the Will typed and as to what happened to that draft. Therefore, the deposition of this witness, Kesuprasad, cannot be rejected on the ground that the particulars of the preparation of the draft or whatever happened prior to the final Will being prepared, were not forthcoming.