Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: VPF in Sri. S M Nandakumar S/O S D Madaiah vs The Regional Commissioner on 20 April, 2011Matching Fragments
The writ appeai is aliswedi. Order ci:1Zec_i. 1 24.2008 passed in W.P.No.2 I 07/ dismissing the wrié peiiiion is set aside.
dated 2.2.2608 yassed big the Sims H Commissiorzer in Corizpiaizzi.
disqizaliifgirzg {he appeliani f Qf {he AC: is set aside. " _
34. Therefore, jibe c:>VAr1.?f.::VV%ii'¢;ii_0'ri._Vpf.iii1é--i<:aiji€ed senior counsel for respondeiiit-%§'Q,§*. Eiéisgisien of the Apex Court is moi appligjabig.-'to':i.ij'¢ having regard to the Act and the Karnaigig: decision of the Divisicm Bencivi is _' aiiso not appiiczable and is ¥€j€C'£€iZi. The by the learned séznior counsel to {$16 g3i'i'€<:§i Jf;Vi1a't5the.é* décision of the Division Bench is per ~ ., ah.<;i th%ii'h'éVdeci.si0n of the iearnad Sirlgie Judge in /2000 dated 2-4/6/2002 has :0 be appiiéd iS.__::élSQ. 'gerréci. Therefore? ail precedentg Cited wiih regai'*:i:£;,:>viih€ ncen~app1iCabiiii3I 0f the decision of the Apax and also the Division Bench Camioi be': appiied in View Vigei" tbs facst that iha €if:<:i:=:«i0:'is of ihej Apfsx £3:/iézri; and iihes