Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

In the facts and circumstances of the case and by consent of both the sides, this matter is taken up for hearing today.

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with the FIR bearing M. Case No. I 1 of 2010 registered with Harij Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 498-A, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr.Prashant Desai, learned senior advocate for Mr.Mrugen Purohit, learned advocate for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent persons and have not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and they have been wrongly arraigned in the commission of the offence. He contended that every articles are now in safe custody in the house of the applicants and whatever articles are there, the applicants are ready to give to the complainant and they have never misused for their own purpose. He contended that the ingredients of Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code regarding dominion over the property is concerned, it is not covered from the contention raised by the complainant also. He contended that the applicant No.1 is a Doctor and working as Pediatrician in Kidney Hospital, at Civil Hospital, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad. He contended that the applicant Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant and applicant No.2 is diabetic patient and suffering from Gullienbarro Syndrom and suffering from paralysis. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case to release the present applicants on anticipatory bail.