Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

14. It is further stated that on 28.11.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582383 for Rs. 2,50,000/- issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1. On 29.11.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582385 for Rs. 3 lakh issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1.

16. It is further stated that on 01.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582387 for Rs. 1 lakh issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Punjab National Bank, Est Patel Nagar, Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1. On 04.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582388 for Rs. 2,50,000/- issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1.

17. It is further stated that on 05.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582389 for Rs. 1,80,000/- issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque CS no. 300/20 Punjab National Bank VS Nargesh Kumar Nagpal & Anr. Page no. 11 of 35 amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1. On 09.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 582390 for Rs. 3 lakh issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Connaught Place, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1.

18. It is further stated that on 12.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 573771 for Rs. 3 lakh issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1. On 20.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got a cheque bearing no. 573772 for Rs. 3 lakh issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheque was received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the CS no. 300/20 Punjab National Bank VS Nargesh Kumar Nagpal & Anr. Page no. 12 of 35 defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1. On 27.12.1997, the defendant no.1 in connivance with defendant no.2 got two cheques bearing no. 582391 and 582392 for Rs. 1,50,000/- each issued by defendant no.1 destroyed when the said cheques were received by the plaintiff bank in inward clearing from Canara Bank, Asaf Ali, New Delhi and got the said cheque amount debited to the imprest account of the plaintiff bank instead of debiting the same to the account of the defendant no.1 and thus not affecting the account of the defendant no.1.