Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
(a) Why the statements of Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav and Shri
Amar Singh were not recorded U/s 161 Cr.P.C?
(b) The opinion given by other two private experts namely
Dr.George Papcun (Ph.D) of "Sound Evidence", America and
"Truth Labs", India clearly found the conversation in CD to be
"doctored" and Truth Labs having analysed the contents of the
FIR No.47/2011: PS I.P Estate (Special Cell): U/s 469 IPC Date of Order: 25.01.2012
said CD with the contents in an earlier CD (famously known as
"Amar Singh Phone Tapping Case"), already lying submitted
before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and some sentences were
found verbatim copied from therein; the copies whereof were
supplied to the investigating agency, but the said opinions were
withheld in the final report.