Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

16. But the contention raised by the petitioner pertains to the purely finding of facts which was recorded by the Ld. Arbitrator after going through the terms and conditions of the contract CS no. 2537/09 Page no. 25 of 32 including drawings/specifications and appreciation of evidence. The Ld. Arbitrator has observed that the special arrangement for disposal of waste water from ground floor flat was same in sample flats as provided for floors above ground floor in terms of the approved drawings/specification. But the representative of the petitioner directed the respondent/claimant to provide the special arrangement for waste water of ground floor flats. The Ld. Arbitrator has further observed that the petitioner has not controverted the amount of Rs. 1,30,494/­ for extra pipes and fittings for disposal of waste water for ground floor flats except the numbers of flats which was respondent/claimant was claiming as 196 whereas petitioner had calculated the number of flats as 182. Therefore, findings recorded on the above said claim no. 4 is purely based on the findings of facts recorded by the Ld. Arbitrator and it is settled law that this court is not to sit as a court of appeal and go for reappraisal of evidence.