Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Richard Lee vs Girish Soni & Ors. on 17 October, 2014Matching Fragments
5. The Supreme Court in Rupchand Gupta vs. Raghuvanshi (Private) Ltd.
& Anr. AIR 1964 SC 1889 held that "....it is quite clear that the law does not required that the sub-lessee need be made party. It has been rightly pointed out by the High Court that in all cases where the landlord institutes a suit against the lessee for possession of the land on the basis of a valid notice to quit served on the lessee and does not impleaded the sub-lessee as a party to the suit, the object of the landlord _______________________________________________________________________ is to eject the sub-lessee from the land in execution of the decree and such an object is quite legitimate. The decree in such a suit would bind the sub-lessee. This may act harshly on the sub-lessee; but this is a position well understood by him when he took the sub-lease. The law allow this and so the omission cannot be said to be an improper act."