Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Traffic apprentice in Rakesh Kumar S/O Sri K.S.P. Singh vs Union Of India Through General Manager ... on 22 November, 2010Matching Fragments
(vii) By an amendment application, the applicant had stated that the respondent no.4, who is similarly situated to the applicant was empanelled by Railway Recruitment Board/ Chandigarh for the post of Traffic apprentice grade 5500-9000 vide GM/P letter dated 31.03.2004 sent for medical examination in A-2 category but he was declared fail in prescribed medical examination and he was declared fit for B-2. Shri Sanjeeb Kumar Saha (Respondent No.4) has been appointed in the alternative category of Commercial Apprentice Gr. 5500-9000/- and he is posted as Commercial Superintendent at Panipat but the same benefit is not being extended to the applicant, Annexure A-18 refers. Hence this O.A.
8. Vide the amendment application; applicant has referred to the case of one Sanjeeb Kumar Saha, Commercial Superintendent, N.R. Panipat, and in Para 4.34 referred to the same. The said Paragraph reads as under:-
4.34. That in this connection it is necessary to point out here that in similar facts and circumstances respondent no.4, who is similarly situated to the applicant was empanelled by Railway Recruitment Board/ Chandigarh for the post of Traffic apprentice grade 5500-9000 vide GM/P letter dated 31.03.2004 sent for medical examination in A-2 category but he was declared fail in prescribed medical examination but he was declared fit for B-2.