Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

34. In the case of Ramadass and Ors. v. K.M. Sen (1956-II-LLJ-473) a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court made a distinction between 'Sanction' and filing of a complaint', while considering Section 34 of the Industrial Disputes Act and held that the law laid down in 1948 PC 82 regarding the order of sanction was not applicable to the complaint which the State was required to file under Section 34 of the Act. However this decision does not seem to have been followed by the Calcutta High Court itself in subsequent decisions. In the case Jiwan Das v. Rabin Sen and Ors. (1956-II-LLJ-323) another Bench of the same High Court held that if the order directing the making of the complaint under Section 34 of the I.D. Act did not indicate, as to when and where the offence was committed, it could not be considered to be valid and sufficient.