Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

2. Issuance of notice of the applications and the suit to defendants for hearing and deciding on merits is resisted on the ground that this shall defeat the very purpose of filing the suit since the defendants would have sufficient opportunity to delete the pirated software from its computer systems and that would make the suit of the plaintiffs infructuous. Thus, the issuance of an ex-parte injunction along with appointment of a Local Commissioner is pressed.

3. Out of the four defendants against whom these suits have been filed, none has business place in Delhi. In C.S. (OS) No.2027 of 2009, the defendants have offices and work places at Bangalore only. Four office addresses of defendants of Bangalore are given in this suit. In C.S. (OS) No.2024 of 2009, the defendants have offices at Ahmedabad, Pune and Bangalore. There are seven number of office addresses of defendants in these three cities. In C.S. (OS) No.2026 of 2009, the defendants are located at Mumbai and there are four number of office addresses of defendants in Mumbai. In C.S. (OS) No.2132 of 2009, the defendants are located at Chandigarh and Mohali (a town near Chandigarh) and Derabassi. There are five number of office address of defendants in Chandigarh and surrounding areas as given in the suit.