Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

On the other hand, these provisions are not confined merely to conduct designed to secure pecuniary advantage to the oppressors; they cover the case of wrongful usurpation of authority, even though the affairs of the company prosper in consequence."

190. In Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd., etc.:

[1965] 2 SCR 720 , this Court quoted with the approval the following passage from the decision in Elder's Case, , as summarized at page 394 in Meyer's case, :