Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

17. Respondent No.2/complainant has made specific allegation of demanding Rs.50,000/- by petitioner Vikram Singh from her and the CD, transcript of which is on record contains the probable voice of both petitioners as per the Forensic Science Laboratory report and refers to their agreement for obtaining illegal gratification in connection with the posting of Assistant Warden. Accordingly, the argument that complaint has no basis at all and it is an attempt to settle personal vendetta against the petitioners cannot be recorded at this stage and the petitioners do not succeed on the reference of Neeraj Dutta vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)- (2023) 4 SCC 731 in the light of allegation levelled against the petitioners and ground no.4(i) does not succeed.