Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Traffic apprentice in Abhay Mishra vs Union Of India on 23 August, 2018Matching Fragments
By Hon'ble Mr. Gokul Chandra Pati, Member (A) The applicant appeared in the written examination in two stages in response to his application for the post of Traffic Apprentice to the advertisement by the Railway Recruitment Board, Bhopal and was successful. He was recommended for appointment to the post of Traffic Apprentice grade Rs. 5500-9000. Vide letter dated 4.7.2008 (Annexure A-5), he was asked to complete certain formalities like Medical Test. He was medically tested for A/2 on 6.8.2008 and was declared unfit, but was declared fit for B/2 medical test, after being asked by the respondents on 26.12.2008 to appear for B/2 medical test.
2. After his medical fitness for B/2 type, the applicant submitted an application dated 16.1.2009 (Annexure A-8) for alternative appointment, since for the post of Traffic Apprentice, A/2 type medical fitness was required as per the rules. Vide the letter dated 4.6.2009 (Annexure A-9), the applicant was refused to be given an alternative appointment. Being aggrieved, the applicant filed the OA No. 75/2010, which was allowed by this Tribunal and vide order dated 11.2.2010 (Annexure A-10), this Tribunal quashed the order dated 4.6.2009 and remitted the case to the respondents for passing fresh reasoned/speaking order.
III. To grant any other appropriate relief, order or direction to which the applicant be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
IV. To award costs in favour of the applicant."
4. The applicant has projected the following main grounds for the OA:-
The respondents issued a letter dated 26.12.2008 to undergo B/2 type medical test after the applicant was declared unfit for A/2 medical test required for Traffic Apprentice post.