Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

24. On 10.5.2003, SLP before Supreme Court against D.B. Order dated 27.3.2003. On 14.5.2003 CLB appointed Justice Jhunjhunuwala (Retired) as the verifying Authority while maintaining all other terms of order dated 27.3.2003. On 15.7.2003 pending SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CLB directed Samir to make payment by 10.8.2003.

25. On 14.8.2003, the petitioners filed C.A. No. 170/2003 under Section 634A for execution of CLB's order dated 15.7.2003.

26. On 29.8.2003, the CLB restrained respondents from alienating immoveable properties, etc.

27. On 27.1.2004, the Verifying Authority made its report identifying 3 out of 10 claims aggregating to Rs. 32,06,330.16 made by Samir to be the "personal Liabilities" of Unmesh. Accordingly, out of the total claim of Rs. 2.73 crores, only a sum of Rs. 32,06,330.16 was held to be the personal liabilities of Unmesh. Hence, even adjusting Rs. 32 lakhs and odd against the dues of Rs. 6,90 crores, still a sum of Rs. 6.58 crores remains outstanding in spite of expiry of both the dates viz. 5.3.2003 and 5.3.2004. Meanwhile, in the execution proceedings under Section 634A before the CLB, Samir continued to take adjournments on account of the pendency of the matter in the Supreme Court.

64. Admittedly, UK Shah Group have filed an application for execution under Section 634A of the Companies Act of CLB's order dated 15.7.2003. The four applications filed by the SK Shah Group dated 13.8.2004 as referred above were also dismissed on 30.8.2004. They have preferred above four Appeals challenging the Common Order dated 21.10.2004. On 17.10.2005 the CLB passed an order on C.A. No. 170/2003, 89/2004 and 189/2005 holding SK Shah Group to pay the appellant UK Shah Group the abovereferred sum and the said order was sent to this High Court for execution. The warrant of attachment was issued by this Court some time in February 2005. Therefore, UK Shah Group on 18.1.2006, as there was no interest amount mentioned, preferred Company Appeal (Lodging) No. 3/2006 and thereafter as noted on 17.5.2006 Consent Order has been passed by the CLB disposing of Company Petition No. 73/2000 and all applications and proceedings pending before the CLB also disposed of accordingly without prejudice to the other legal proceedings pending between the parties.