Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(c) of the Indian Succession Act. This endorsement is only regarding admission of Kasturmal Agrawal before Sub Registrar that he executed that Will. Such vague endorsement by Sub Registrar is not sufficient to prove the compliance of Section 63

(c) of the Indian Succession Act. The judgment in the case of "Bandopant Sitaram Bapat Vs. Sitaram Bapat" (supra) relied by learned Counsel is distinguishable on facts that in that case one attesting witness was examined to prove the 37 fa2577.13 compliance of Section 63 (c) of Indian Succession Act. The case of "Ved Mitra Verma Vs. Dharam Dev Varma" (supra) relied by learned Counsel for the respondents is also distinguishable on facts for the reason that in that case Sub Registrar was examined as witness to prove the compliance of Section 63 (c) of the Indian Succession Act. In the case of "Theressa Vs. Fransic J. Misquita"