Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4.1. It was suggested that Mr. R.K. Tejwani was assigned this task as his father and brother i.e. Mr. S.L. Tejwani and Mr. Ashok Tejwani were carrying on the business of documentation and liaison work respectively which involved converting immovable properties from leasehold to freehold.

4.2. It was averred that, accordingly, necessary documents were executed by the defendants on that very date i.e. 22.01.2008. These documents were, however, lost by Mr. R.K. Tejwani, and therefore, a fresh set of documents were executed by the defendants for submission to the DDA on 01.04.2008.

6.3. The plaintiff also denied that the defendants executed a set of documents, as averred by them, for being submitted to the DDA, either on 22.01.2008 or, a fresh set of documents on 01.04.2008, when the earlier set documents were purportedly lost.

6.4. The plaintiff stressed the fact that the ATS was executed in his "individual" capacity. The plaintiff admitted that he had, in the past, carried on business under the name, M/s S.P. Associates, which had not been operable since 2005 and that since 1978, he has been in the business of dealing in cycles and cycle parts under the name, M/s Commercial Agency.

10.2. Although the defendants had signed the necessary forms and documents on 22.01.2008, Mr. R.K. Tejwani had lost the same and therefore, another set of documents was signed by the defendants on 01.04.2008. The defendants had retained copies of these documents i.e. Ex. DW-1/1 to Ex. DW-1/8. Mr. R.K. Tejwani failed to fulfil his mandate.