Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole+tada in Asfaq S/O Shri Abdul Aziz vs The State Of Rajasthan Through Joint ... on 7 July, 2025Matching Fragments
4. The petitioner has already availed four paroles and nothing has been brought to the notice of this Court that these orders were ever challenged. In such circumstances, the ground for rejection of parole that the petitioner was convicted under the TADA Act, cannot be sustained.
5. The impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the respondent No.1 - Joint Secretary (Home), Government of Rajasthan to decide the prayer for emergent parole afresh in accordance with law after verifying the factual aspects within fifteen days from today.