Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mandatory injunctions in Sh. Radhey Shyam vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 4 August, 2011Matching Fragments
1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendants and for restraining the defendants from interfering in any manner or from forcibly dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property. Initially, the suit was filed by the plaintiff for permanent and mandatory injunctions but the same was amended and relief of declaration was included and DDA was impleaded as defendant no.2.
3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of permanent and mandatory injunctions as prayed for? OPP
4) Relief.
6. Thereafter the parties were directed to lead their evidence. In support of his case, the plaintiff has examined himself as PW1 and filed his examination in chief by way of affidavit Ex.PW1/A. PW1 has also proved on record the site plan of the suit property as Ex.PW1/1; GPA as Ex.PW1/2; agreement to sell as Ex.PW1/3; acknowledgment receipt as Ex.PW1/5; Khasra Girdawari as Ex.PW1/6; certified copy of the statements recorded in Suit no.828/01 as Ex.PW1/7; certified copy of compromise application as Ex.PW1/8 and certified copy of compromise deed as Ex.PW1/9; photographs as Mark A to E and the letter issued in favour of M/s. Anshul Contractor as Mark F. No other witness was examined by the plaintiff despite opportunity being given and Suit No.18/09 Page : 6/16 vide order dated 29.5.2009, PE was closed.