Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. The Income Tax Department has filed these appeals under Section 377 of Cr.P.C. against the sentence on the ground of its inadequacy. The details of these appeals are as under:

Sl. Crl Appeal Trial Court C.C.NO. with Offence Sentence No (H.C) name judgment Date 1 1339/2020 Spl. Court 148/2018 dtd. Sec 276 B 25,000/-
                    for           19/10/2019       R/w    278B
                    economic                       of I.T Act.
                    offences at                    1961 with
                    Bengaluru                      Rule 30
2     925/2021      Same          147/2018         Same          25,000/-
                                  Dtd.
                                  19/10/2019

3     950/2021      Same          149/2018 dtd.    Sec 276B      25,000/-
                                  19/10/2019
4     954/2021      Same          101/2018 dtd.    Sec 276 B     20,000/-
                                  16/11/2019       R/w    278B
                                                   of I.T Act.
                                                   1961 with
                                                   Rule 30
5     1207/2021     Same          74/2019 dtd.     Sec 276B      20,000/-
                                  19/12/2020
6     1222/2021     Same          68/2018 dtd.     Sec 276B      20,000/-
                                  23/10/2020
7     1223/2021     Same          77/2018 dtd.     Sec 276B      1,00,000/-
                                  15/02/2020
8     1224/2021     Same          86/2018 dtd.     Sec 276B      25,000/-
                                  28/10/2020
9     1229/2021     Same          84/2018   dtd.   Sec 276B      25,000/-
                                  28/10/2020
10    1319/2021     Same          81/2019          Sec 276B      5,000/-
                                  Dtd.
                                  19/03/2020





11   1326/2021      Same       78/2019   dtd.   Sec 276 B          -
                               19/03/2020       R/w   278B
                                                of I.T Act.

12   1330/2021      Same       77/2019    dtd   Sec 276 B      5,000/-
                               19/03/2020       R/w   278B
                                                of I.T Act.

13   1337/2021      Same       104/2019         Sec 276 B      10,000/-
                               Dtd.             R/w   278B
                               19/03/2020       of I.T Act.

14   672/2022       Same       76/2019          Sec 276 B      20,000/-
                               Dtd.
                               19/12/2020
15   810/2022       Same       50/2019          Sec 276 B      10,000/-
                               Dtd.             R/w   278B
                               16/09/2021       of I.T Act.

16   898/2022       Same       87/2019          Sec 276 B      20,000/-
                                Dtd.
                               16/10/2021
17   2233/2022      Same       85/2018          Sec 276 B      25,000/-
                               Dtd.
                               28/10/2020
18   2245/2022      Same       128/2018         Sec 276 B      20,000/-
                               Dtd.
                               28/10/2020
19   1913/2023      Same       90/2019          Sec 276 B      10,000/-
                               Dtd.
                               30/05/2023
20   2104/2023      Same       89/2019          Sec 276 B      10,000/-
                               Dtd.
                               25/09/2020



     2.      The    judgment      of    conviction   and      order      on

18. The offences under Chapter XXII of the I.T. Act, 1961 are non-cognizable offences in view of Section 279-A of the I.T. Act, 1961 which reads thus:
"279A. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 an offence punishable under Section 276B or section 276C or section 276CC or section 277 or Section 278 shall be deemed to be non- cognizable within the meaning of that Code."
49