Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2.3 Candidates who do not fulfill the minimum score requirement under the API Scoring System proposed in the Regulations as per Tables II (A and B) of Appendix I or those who obtain less than 50% in the expert assessment of the selection process will have to be re-assessed only after a minimum period of one sear. The date of promotion shall be the date on which he / she is successfully reassessed.

2.4 The Selection Committee specifications as delineated in Clause 4 are applicable to Career Advancement promotions of Assistant Professor to Associate Professor and Associate Professor to Professor. CAS promotions from a lower grade to a higher grade of Assistant Professor/ Associate Professor shall he conducted by a "Scrtning-cum-Evaluation Committee' adhering to the criteria laid 2.5 CAS promotions from a lower grade to a higher grade of Assistant Professor/ Associate Professor shall he conducted by a "Screening-cum-Evaluation Committee' adhering to the criteria laid out as API score in Performance Based Appraisal System (PEAS) in the table of Appendix I. 2.6 The 'Screwing-cum-Evaluation Committee- for CAS promotion of Assistant Professors Associate Professor from one AOP to the other higher AGP shall consist of :

[3]
For Government/ Government Aided/ Government Autonomous Colleges:
[I] As may be prescribed by the respective State Governments/ Board of Governs 2.7 The quorum for these committees in both categories mentioned above shall be three including one subject expert / University nominee need to be present.
2.8 The Screening-cum-Evaluation Committee on verification / evaluation of API score secured by the candidate through the 'PBAS' methodology designed by the respective University / Directorate of Technical Education based on these Regulations and as per the minimum requirement specified in Tables II and III of Appendix I for each of the cadre of Assistant Professor, shall recommend to the Syndicate !Executive Council/Board of Management of the University / College about the suitability for the promotion of the candidate(s) under CAS for implementation.
2.11 The incumbent teacher must be on the roll and active service of the Universities /Colleges on the date of consideration by the Selection Committee for Selection / CAS Promotion.
2.12 Candidates shall offer themselves for assessment for promotion, if they fulfil the minimum API scores indicated in the appropriate API system tables by submitting an application and the required PBAS proforma. They can do so three months before the due date of the promotion if they consider themselves eligible. In any event, the University / College concerned shall send a general circular twice a year calling for applications for CAS promotions from eligible candidates.
2.13 In the final assessment, if the candidates do not either fulfill the minimum API scores in the criteria as per PBAS proforma or obtain less than 50% in expert assessment, wherever applicable, such candidates will be reassessed only after a minimum period of one year.
2.14 If a candidate applies for promotion immediately on completion of the minimum period and is successful, the date of promotion will be made applicable the date of completion of minimum period 2.15 If, however, the candidate finds that he /she fulfils the eligibility conditions at a later date and applies on that date and is successful, his/her promotion will be effected from the date of application.