Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

2.The case of the petitioner is that she has passed 10th Std in the year 1991 and she hails from Hindu Parayan Community and residing with husband and children at the address given in the writ petition and registered her name in District Employment Office, Nagapattinam on 12.05.1993. When the post of Servant in Anganvadi Centre was to be filled up, applications were invited and the petitioner was called for an interview on 12.01.2009. She also participated in the interview conducted by the second respondent and submitted that she got good marks in the interview and she has fulfilled all the conditions of the second respondent and she would be selected for the said post. The petitioner was surprised that the third respondent was selected, who is far away from the Anganvadi Centre and got less http://www.judis.nic.in marks than the petitioner and the selection was unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioner would submit that the first respondent had appointed the third respondent on the recommendation of the second respondent who is not at all qualified to hold the post. She would also submit that she is residing 32 metres from the Anganvadi Centre and the appointment of 3rd respondent is in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.