Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

-Ss. 120 B, 406, 409, 411, 420, 465, 466, 468,471 and 109 r/w S.34 - Prevention of corruption Act, 1988, S.13(2) r/w Ss.13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d)."
4. By way of reply, the learned counsel for the first respondent police (R1) submitted a counter-objection stating that the petitioner and one Selvam, who was authorized by Mr. Manikavel, lodged a complaint before them stating that nearly 25 documents( Uploaded https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis were missing. Among on: 18/03/2025 these, 08:03:34 pm ) 13 original documents belonged to Naveen Balaji (petitioner) and 11 original documents belonged to Manikavel. Upon verification and exhaustive enquiry, the Station House Officer (SHO) recorded the missing status of the above documents in the General Diary, Vol. No.22, Page No.13, Sl. No.37.
5. Pursuant to this, the SHO issued a Non-Traceable Certificate on 20.06.2023, listing the details of the missing documents and stating that necessary action would be taken to trace them. On 25.06.2023, the petitioner lodged another complaint, alleging that his missing documents had been stolen and misappropriated by Ramraj, C.K.S. Karthikeyan, and Velu, and requested necessary action against them. Upon receiving this complaint, the police called the accused persons for enquiry, but they did not appear.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/03/2025 08:03:34 pm )

8. Furthermore, it was submitted that four individuals Ramraj, C.K.S. Karthikeyan, Velu, and Pon.Raja claim to possess the original missing documents but have not produced them before the police for verification. They are allegedly withholding these documents with the ill intention of extorting a huge sum from the complainant, making custodial interrogation necessary. Therefore, the petitioner prays for the cancellation of anticipatory bail.