Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

35. At the cost of repetition, as discussed supra, in Human Anatomy Subject Paper-II the difference between the marks awarded by 1st and 2nd evaluator is 14. Therefore, the same was evaluated by 3rd evaluator, who KL,J awarded 23.5 marks out of 100 marks, which was rounded off to 24 marks. The average is 30 out of 100 marks. Therefore, the petitioner cannot allege that there is violation of procedure and that there are discrepancies in the answer scripts. Petitioner also cannot allege that evaluators did not apply their mind while assessing the marks. As discussed supra, evaluation is a skilled job and it requires expertise. It is the specific contention of respondent No.2 that they are evaluating the answer scripts digitally and none of the examiners will be aware of the identity of the students whose answer scripts is being evaluated.