Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Trishul Developers vs Smart Asset Services India Pvt Ltd on 20 June, 2022

Author: S.G. Pandit

Bench: S.G. Pandit

                             1


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

                        BEFORE

        THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT

       WRIT PETITION No.19343/2021 (GM-RES)


BETWEEN:

1.   TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
     A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT MITTAL TOWERS
     NO.109, 'B' WING, FIRST FLOOR, NO.6
     M G ROAD, BANGALORE-560001
     REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
     MR. NIRAJ MITTAL.

2.   MR. NIRAJ MITTAL
     MAJOR
     MANAGING PARTNER
     TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
     MITTAL TOWERS, NO.109
     'B' WING, FIRST FLOOR, NO.6
     M G ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.

3.   MR. O P MITTAL
     MAJOR
     PARTNER, TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
     MITTAL TOWERS
     NO.109, 'B' WING, FIRST FLOOR
     NO.6, M G ROAD
     BANGALORE-560001.

4.   MRS. UMA MITTAL
     MAJOR
     PARTNER, TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
     MITTAL TOWERS
     NO.109, 'B' WING, FIRST FLOOR
     NO.6, M G ROAD
     BANGALORE-560001.
                               2


5.    MRS. JYOTI MITTAL
      MAJOR
      PARTNER, TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
      MITTAL TOWERS
      NO.109, 'B' WING, FIRST FLOOR
      NO.6, M G ROAD
      BANGALORE-560001.

      NOS. 3 TO 5 REPRESENTED BY THE
      PETITIONER NO.2, MR. NIRAJ MITTAL.
                                             ...PETITIONERS

(BY SMT. H PAVITHRA, ADV.)

AND:

SMART ASSET SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
NO.151, 9TH MAIN
6TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560102.
                                            ...RESPONDENT

(BY KUM. SHRIVIDYA, ADV. FOR
 SRI SHIVAPRASAD SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADV.)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER, DATED
21.09.2021, PASSED BY THE LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND     SESSIONS    JUDGE     (CCH-84),    BANGALORE     IN
COMM.A.S.NO.64 OF 2019, AND TO DIRECT THE DISTRICT
COURT TO ACCEPT THE PROPERTIES OFFERED BY THE
PETITIONERS IN THEIR APPLICATION U/S 36 (2) AS SECURITY
IN LIEU THEREOF.


       THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
                              3



                       ORDER

Memo dated 20.06.2022 is filed by learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the petition has become infructuous.

2. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

SD/-

JUDGE NG* CT:bms