Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. Admittedly, here, in the instant case, the order of ejectment of the petitioner has attained finality and as such, the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties had also come to an end. Now, the landlord is seeking execution of the ejectment order and as such, his attempt to get possession of the demised premises cannot be allowed to be frustrated by the tenant, who is now taking the frivolous ground for re-establishing the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. If any subsequent petition has been filed by the landlord in order to recover the rent, the payment of which appears to have been stopped by the tenant/petitioner, that would not have any effect on the execution proceedings. The order of ejectment against the petitioner had attained finality in the year 2005, but till today, the petitioner has not handed over possession of the demised premises to the landlord/respondent.