Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

33. During the course of further investigation a complaint dated 25.1.2005 received on 31.1.2005 was assigned to him and in the said complaint the name of an eye witness was disclosed as Satinder Thakur s/o Suraj Nandan Thakur r/o 42, Chot Pur Chajarsi. On receipt of said complaint he also interrogated the above named eye witness and his statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C was also recorded by him. The alleged eye witness also gave in writing in his own hand that he had not seen the accident and was not aware of any fact about it . His statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C is Ex. R2W1/3 and his hand written statement is Ex.R2W1/4. In the said complaint the registration number of the offending vehicle was disclosed as DL­1PB­4678. He also investigated the matter, the driver and owner of the alleged offending vehicle were interrogated wherein it was revealed that at the time of accident the possibility of presence of said vehicle at the place of accident had been totally ruled out however it is brought on record that at the time of accident the vehicle was already parked at Hari Nagar and time table showing the movement of the vehicle on the day MACT NO.114/06 MEHUL VERMA VS. HARBANS LAL & ORS.