Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Motion Re in Ctp Environement S.A.S vs Sentro Technologies Limited And Anr on 12 July, 2016Matching Fragments
RE: NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 912 OF 2015
4. In my view, this Notice of Motion is completely misconceived and not maintainable. The reasons are many. To begin with, the cast of the prayer is wrong. This being a Chartered High Court, in view of the provisions of Order 49 Rule 3, there is no question of rejection of a plaint under Order 7 Rule 10. That Rule does not apply to the Chartered High Courts. In any case, that Rule is for return of the plaint and not for rejection of the plaint, which is a completely different aspect.
8. On a plain reading of the Plaint, therefore, this Court would have jurisdiction. Notice of Motion No. 912 of 2015 must be dismissed. It is.
RE: NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 913 OF 2015
9. This Notice of Motion proceeds on the basis that the Defendants were not served at the time of my ad-interim order of 10th October 2014 or the final order on the Notice of Motion on 8th January 2015 (Gupte J).