Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: v.uthirapathi in M.R. Venkat Reddy vs Smt. N. Harshada on 11 January, 2023Matching Fragments
Now the point is whether the appeal can be continued in the absence of LRs., of respondent /Complainant. For this the provision i.e., 0rder-22, Rule- 12 is very clear which reads as under:
"Order -22 Rule-12: Application of order to proceedings - Nothing in Rules 3,4 and 8 shall apply to proceedings in execution of a decree or order."
And in Varadarajan Vs. Kanakavalli & Others the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with the similar issues had relied on their own Judgment i.e., V.Uthirapathi Vs. Ashrab & Others and held that "in other words, the normal principle arising in a suit - before the decree is passed - that the legal representatives are to be brough on record within a particular period and if not, the suit could abate, - is not applicable to cases of death of the decree-holder or the judgment debtor in execution proceedings."