Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

That appeal, therefore was dismissed in view of that compromise and by that judgment and order, the present appellant was allowed six months' period to vacate the premises without any condition and which period expired on 5th December 1971. The Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1971 (hereinafter called the Himachal Pradesh Act) had by then come into force. On 6th December, 1971. the landlady. who had obtained the decree brought out execution proceedings before the Senior Sub Judge for ejectment of the present appellant in pursuance of the order of the High Court The judgment debtor filed objection petition under Section 47 of the Civil P. C. and pleaded that Section 14 (1) of the H. P. Act barred the execution of the decree as conditions laid down in that section were not satisfied. It was further objected that the Act also barred the execution of the decree. It was also averred that the notification did not hold good for the H. P. Act, as the decree-holder stood deprived of its advantage on 5th November. 1971. It was also pleaded that a fresh" tenancy was created on 4th June, 1971. as a result of the compromise. At any rate, the order of the learned Single Judge was not executable and the decree-holder was merely entitled to a money claim to be calculated at the rate of Rs. 10/- per day till the period the tenant chose to vacate the premises.