Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(ii) GUJARAT TRADE UNION MANCH v. GSTC ((2000) 99 CC 461). In this case, a Division Bench of Gujarat High Court has held that the decision of the Board is that of expert Body and ordinarily a decision of such a Body is not interfered unless it is palpably wrong or is such that no reasonable man of ordinary prudence would reach such a decision and ultimately dismissed the writ petition holding that it was not a fit case for interference.

(iii) A.R.C. CEMENT LTD. v. A.A.I.F.R. ((1999) 97 CC 459). In this case, BIFR found that revival is not viable and recommended for winding up of the company. The court held that it will not interfere with the said finding. It was held that the statutory functionaries under the Act have to function within limitations and that within the frame work of the law and equity in law is always a consideration even while interpreting any statute, but where equities are in contradiction of the law or force the authority to go beyond the law, no relief in such equity could be granted. Ultimately , the court held that the court will not sit in judgment nor scrutinise the figures just to find holes in the inferences drawn by the BIFR and AAIFR.