Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: matsyafed in Dr.Jojo Enas vs Kerala State Pollution Control BoardMatching Fragments
MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, C.J.
This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.03.2016 passed in W.P(C) No.10998 of 2016 inasmuch as the appellant is aggrieved by direction No.3 issued therein which reads thus:
"However, it is made clear that if no decision is taken so far, the 4th respondent can be permitted to continue till a decision is taken by the Kerala State Pollution Control Board."
It is alleged by the appellant that because of the establishment of the fish stall by the 4th respondent, Matsyafed, bad odor is emanating and consequently it is impossible for him, being a doctor, to run his hospital by the side of the fish stall in question. According to the appellant, since the fish stall is established without following the norms and without getting appropriate sanction from the Kerala Pollution Control Board and by violating the norms relating to distance rule, the 4th respondent is not entitled to continue the fish stall.