Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: aparesh kumar singh in Saheb Ram Mahto vs Home Department on 5 May, 2014Matching Fragments
In such circumstances, on objective consideration of all the relevant grounds raised by the petitioner, no case is made out by the petitioner for interference in the matter. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A. Mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Md. Iqbal Khan ....... Petitioner
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board & Ors. ........ Respondents
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar
For the Respondents : Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari
03/05.05.2014 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Bihar
Let the name of counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- B.S.E.B be reflected in the cause list, thereafter.
List this case after 2 weeks.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A. Mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Mungia Kamim ....... Petitioner
Versus
M/s Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization & Ors. ........ Respondents
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha
For the Respondents(CCL) : M/s Amit Kr. Das & Arvind Kumar
For the Respondent(CMPF) : Mr. L.C.N.Shahdeo
08/05.05.2014 Heard counsel for the parties.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A. Mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sakal Singh ....... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ........ Respondents
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi
For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Singh, C.G.C
02/05.05.2014 Heard counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A. Mohanty
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Shivmuni Ram ....... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar
For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.III
02/05.05.2014 The petitioner has challenged the order of his suspension contained in