Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Page 20 of 33

HC-NIC Page 20 of 33 Created On Thu Feb 04 02:04:45 IST 2016 (18) In   order   to   appreciate   the   contentions  raised   by   the   learned   advocate   for   the  petitioner­Society   it   would   be   appropriate  to   refer   to   the   first   lay­out   plan   dated  11.06.1972  (at Annexure­B to the petition).  Said lay­out plan was sanctioned by District  Development Officer, Ahmedabad. Said lay­out  plan shows that 17 sub­plots were there with  a   common   plot   and   frontage   of   the  petitioner­Society was 200 mtrs. Gandhinagar  road,   which   is   a   highway.   Similarly,   on  perusal   of   the   revised   lay­out   plan   it  appears   that   the   tenements   were   increased  from 17 (in the first approved lay­out plan)  to   23.   On   further   perusal   of   the   revised  lay­out   plan,   though   it   appears   that   20  mtrs. Neliya road is shown the said road is  not   of   the   ownership   of   the   petitioner­ Society. Taking base of the approved plan it  appears that on the front of the petitioner­ Society   there   is   200   mtrs.   Gandhinagar  Highway. In between the tenement Nos.18 and  17   there   is   20   ft.   approach   road   and  similarly   20   ft.   approach   road   is   provided  at   every   interval,   which   has   direct   access  to   the   road,   which   is   mentioned   in   the  Gandhinagar   Highway.   Said   lay­out   plan  clearly   indicates   even   the   boundary   of   the  final   plot.   It   is   also   found   from   the  HC-NIC Page 21 of 33 Created On Thu Feb 04 02:04:45 IST 2016 revised   approved   plan   that   there   are  internal   roads   provided   between   two   plots,  between   20­21   and   18­19,   similarly   between  14­15 and 16­17 etc. and at every stage such  sub­divisions are made. The approved lay­out  plan clearly shows that right from Plot No.6  to   the   North   to   it   at   the   top   i.e.   Plot  No.19   there   is   a   clear­cut   margin   land  provided   and   after   the   margin   land   the  boundary   to   the   land   belonging   to   the  petitioner­Society  is shown. Neliya  Road is  beyond the same. There is nothing on record  to   show   that   the   original   owners   from   whom  the petitioner­Society purchased the land in  the year 1965 had any right over the Neliya.  In fact the petitioner­Society has stated in  the   petition   that   the   same   belongs   to   the  State   Government.   That   there   is   nothing   to  show   that   the   petitioner­Society   has  constructed   dwellings   after   obtaining   any  permission to construct, however, it is not  necessary for this Court to inquire into it  further and it is an admitted position that  the   petitioner­Society   has   filed   the  applications   as   well   as   this   petition   only  when   the   scheme   is   at   the   stage   of  implementation,  without  raising   any  objections   whatsoever   as   observed  hereinabove.