Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 406 498a in P.S. Moti Nagar vs Smt. Vimal Dhawan W/O Passi Dhawan on 13 September, 2017Matching Fragments
4. A case FIR bearing no. 83/2008 was registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on 10.03.2008 on the statement of the complainant. The complainant lodged a complaint in CAW Cell, West District, Delhi. After inquiry the complaint was sent to SHO concerned for registration of the FIR. The complainant has alleged commissions of the offence punishable under Section 406/498A IPC against the 11 persons. The police after completion of the investigation filed the chargesheet against 11 accused persons. The Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate had summoned all the accused persons except accused Vijay UID No. 55969/2016 State Vs Vimal Dhawan Etc. UID No. 55806/2016 Aarti Dhawan Vs Virender Dhawan Etc. 4 of 14 Dhingra and Ved Dhingra vide order dated 20.10.2011. The Ld. Trial Court after hearing the arguments on the charge vide order dated 07.04.2016 has held that prima facie material is on record against the accused Virender (husband) for commission of the offence punishable under Section 498A/406 IPC. However, the Ld. Trial Court has discharged the remaining accused persons for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 498A/406 IPC.
12. The perusal of the material on record would reveals that the complainant has implicated all the near and the distant relatives of husband in the present case.
13. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the judgment reported as Preeti Gupta & Another Vs State of Jharkhand UID No. 55969/2016 State Vs Vimal Dhawan Etc. UID No. 55806/2016 Aarti Dhawan Vs Virender Dhawan Etc. 9 of 14 & Another 2010 (4) RCR (Criminal) has observed as under: "A large number of complaints under Section 498A/406 IPC are not bonafide. The majority of the complaints are filed either on the advice of members of Bar or with their concurrence with exaggerated versions. Large number of these complaints have not only flooded the courts but also have led to enormous social unrest affecting peace, harmony and happiness of the society".
14. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has recently came down heavily regarding the misuse of Section 406/498A IPC. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a recent judgment titled as Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar & Another (2014) 8 Supreme Court Cases 273 has held as under: There is a phenomenal increase in matrimonial disputes in recent years. The institution of marriage is greatly revered in this country. Section 498A IPC was introduced with avowed object to combat the menace of harassment to a woman at the hands of her husband and his relatives. The fact t hat Section 498A IPC is a cognizable and non bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by UID No. 55969/2016 State Vs Vimal Dhawan Etc. UID No. 55806/2016 Aarti Dhawan Vs Virender Dhawan Etc. 10 of 14 disgruntled wives. The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bedridden grandfathers and grandfathers and grandmothers of the husband, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested".
17. The charge against the accused/husband for commission of the offence punishable under Section 498A/406 IPC has already been framed by the Ld. Trial Court. The perusal of the Ld. Trial Court record would reveals that the complainant has not levelled specific allegations for commission of the offence punishable under Section 406/498A IPC against the accused persons, who are discharged by the Ld. Trial Court. The accused who are discharged by the Ld. Trial Court are the distant relatives of the husband of the complainant.