Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(ii) Both the aspects urged by the petitioner have no merits because if petitioner questions her position in the seniority list or questions the merit of the common seniority list, then this aspect would be examined when petitioner files proceedings challenging the common seniority list, but that does not mean that a common seniority list is not being maintained by the respondent no. 2/Society of the schools run by it in the name of GHPS. What ought to be the correct seniority in the list, and, not maintaining of a common seniority list, are two totally separate aspects. Once common seniority list is maintained an employee woring in one school can be transferred to another school.