Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3 (1). The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff's grand father namely M.P.Kumaraswamy Gounder, purchased a vacant site measuring to an extent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis of 5470 sq.ft. in Survey No.314/2, Paruthipattu Village, Poonthamalee, Thiruvallur District, through sale deed 1.2.1995 in the name of the plaintiff. The said land has been developed as a house site and after the purchase, the plaintiff has permitted the staff of her mother's institution namely St.Peter's Engineering College in Paruthipattu Village, Avadi, for their accommodation. There is no passage or road running in the plaintiff schedule property in S.No.314. The first defendant who is a neighbour, who claims to own certain lands in S.No.312 of the said village and the 2nd defendant is the first defendant's sister and the 3rd defendant is the wife of the first defendant and defendants 4 and 5 are relatives of the first defendant.

(ii) The first defendant who was occupying a plot of land on the western side of the plaintiff's property wanted to reach the land in S.No.312 by the private road and started to assert that the said private road connects S.No.315 and 312 which is factually not so. The first defendant has access in the neighbouring Survey Number more particularly in S.No.313 to reach the lands in S.No.312. The first defendant in order to reach the said land in S.No. 312, tried to extend the private road through the plaintiff's property which was prevented by the plaintiff. The defendants who are all close relatives joined https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis together and tried to disturb the possession of the plaintiff on 13.11.2006. Therefore, the employee of plaintiff's mother's institution, one Mr. Nagarajan gave a police complaint before P-6 Avadi Police Station. The defendants have no manner of right to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot of the plaintiff. Hence, the suit is filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, or anybody on behalf them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property in Survey No. 314/2, No.3, Paruthipattu Village. Poonthamallee, Thiruvallur District.

4(i). The case of the defendants is that the plaintiff has not come to the Court with clean hands and she has suppressed the material facts and filed this Suit. The father of the first defendant Mr. Srinivasalu Naidu, purchased the land measuring 1.30 acre in Ayan Panja S.No.312 situated in Paruthipattu Village from Mr.Nagarathina Naicker, through the sale deed dated 06.11.1951. Ever since the date of purchase, the defendants' father was in possession and enjoyment of the land by cultivating the same. The father of the first defendant was died. Thereafter, the said property was allotted to the first defendant through Family Partition deed dated 29.11.1995. The first https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis defendant is having access to the land from the main road only through the 20 feet road situated on the northern side of his cultivating land. The said 20 feet road comprised in S.No.314. The first defendant and other villagers have been using the 20 feet road in S.No.314. The first defendant has no other access to reach his land. The Avadi Municipality has assigned T.S.No.33 to the first defendant land and T.S.No.28 to the 20 feet road.

32. In Ex.A4 which is purchased by Chandiran, the property mentioned as Paruthipattu Village Punjai S.No.314/2, in this east of 20 feet with common pathway, west of Kannapiran Vagayara south plot of Kamala and north of S.No.312. In these, four boundaries an extent of 2000 sq.ft was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis purchased. In the Ex.A5 sale deed in the name of Govindarajalu the property details stated as Paruthipattu Village Punjai S.No.314/2, in this west of 20 feet road common pathway south of plot of Nirmala cast of Ranganathan vagayara, north of S.No.312, in this 1410 sq.ft land was purchased by the Govindarajalu. Therefore, from the documents filed by the plaintiff i.e., Exs A3 to A5, it is clear that the vendor of the plaintiff namely Nirmala had purchased an extent of 1390 sq.ft with a four boundary of 20 feet width common pathway. Another vendor namely Chandiran also purchased plot in S.No.314/2 Paruthipattu Village for an extent of 2000 sq.ft with a four boundary of 20 feet width common pathway. The another vendor namely Govindarajalu through Ex.A5 has purchased plot in S.No.314/2 Paruthipattu Village with an extent of 1410 sq.ft with four boundary of 20 feet width common pathway. Therefore, from the above said documents, it is clear that the plaintiff's vendor had right over the property only for an extent of 1390+1410+ 2000 sq.ft in total=4680 sq.ft. With 20 feet pathway right.