Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: procured document in State vs Birender Etc. on 15 January, 2011Matching Fragments
11 It is further to be seen that the concerned doctor who examined the complainant has not been examined to prove the MLC and PW6 Dr. Uday Kumar Singh has been examined in respect of the treatment given to the complainant at DDU Hospital. Thus in the absence of testimony of the said doctor, the MLC remains unproved. 12 Furthermore, the IO of this case has not been examined for reasons best known to him. In absence of any testimony coming from the mouth of the Investigating Officer, the aim of the whole investigation vitiated and the documents procured and prepared by him remain unproved.