Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: para wise reply in Gangumal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 22 April, 2009Matching Fragments
With the aforesaid averments, the petitioners have prayed that respondents be directed to rehabilitate and compensate the petitioners for the loss and damages occurred to them. They have further prayed for issuance of writ of prohibition permanently restraining the respondents from making any construction on the demolished property until & unless the petitioners are rehabilitated and duly compensated.
5. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in their counter affidavit have submitted that the petitioners are not lessee as no lease was ever granted in favour of the petitioners by the State/ Department of Revenue in respect of the land over which structures/shops of the petitioners are standing. Since there is no lease in favour of the petitioners, the question of renewal of lease does not arise. The petitioners are encroachers on the aforesaid piece of land as per revenue records available with the respondents. Entire action of demolition is being undertaken by the respondent Municipal Corporation, therefore, detailed para-wise reply to the petitions has not been filed by respondent No.1 to 3.