Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. Going through the reasons mentioned above, there does not seem to be any logical reason for not issuing offer of appointment to the selected candidates. All reasons forwarded by the Chairman, AAI, seem to be an afterthought, and cannot stand the scrutiny of law. The posts have been advertised and selection process has been completed. Now, withholding the issue of „letter of appointment‟ on the pretext of above reasons defies all logic.
5. It is against the principles of natural justice to deny offer of appointment to candidates after their selection, when all the reasons mentioned above should have been taken into consideration at an appropriate stage, before starting the recruitment process. There is absolutely no justification in with holding the offer of appointment to a select number of candidates, after completing the selection process and issuing offer of appointment to the some candidates.
(Alok Shekhar) Director (S)/14.6.2010"
W.P.(C) Nos. 2136 & 2133 of 2010 Page 13 of 15

30. Thereafter the file was sent to the Secretary for his approval who on 14.6.2010 has made the following noting. 

             "I totally agree.      After completing the
             selection process there is no             valid

justification for withholding the result. In the case of Manager ATM, the roll numbers of all 68 successful candidates were published on the website but were withdrawn later and after (illegible) months (!) a list of 35 was issued. ATM/CNS wing is already facing manpower shortage.