Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: notification dated 22.12.2014 in Pranjal Karera vs Union Of India on 9 August, 2024Matching Fragments
9. The notification dated 22.12.2014 was matter under consideration which was challenged before the High Court of Kerala in W.P.(C) No. 3097/2016 and vide Order dated 06.03.2024 the court, after considering the above facts, found that the notification dated 22.12.2014 was not in accordance with the law and quashed the notification dated 22.12.2014.10
OA No. 93/2024(CZ) Pranjal Karera Vs. Union of India & Ors.
10. The contention of the applicant is that after quashing the notification dated 22.12.2014 the general condition as note of the original notification, 2006 will apply.
11. The submissions of the Learned Counsel for the applicant are that as per the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006, projects and activities are categorized as Category A and B wherein Category A projects require Environmental Clearance from the Sector specific EACs at the Central level, whereas Category B projects which relatively have a lower potential impact on the Environment would require the same from the State i.e. by the respective State SEACs/ SEIAAs. This categorization is based on the 'extend of potential impacts on human health and natural and manmade resources'. Apropos, the projects and activities of a higher and larger magnitude in terms of the potential adverse impact on the environment as a whole are appraised at the central level by sector specific EACs that constitute of Experts in the particular field. Whereas, such projects and activities having a relatively lesser impact, are appraised at the State level by respective State SEACs/ SEIAAs that consist of homogeneous mix of experts and professionals from different sectors. The schedule of the EIA 2006 notification categorizes Building and Construction Projects and Townships and Area Development Projects as Category B1 projects under item 8(a) and item 8(b) of the Schedule and thus, the appraisal is being done at the State level i.e. by respective SEACs, however it is to be appraised at the Central level if it falls in an ecologically sensitive area/ Critically polluted area or other areas as indicated in the General Conditions.
EIA, 2006 (2014 Amendment) The MOEF thereafter issued Notification dated 22.12.2014 whereby the EIA, 2006 was amended and interalia a Note 2 was inserted in the 5th Column of Item 8, Schedule EIA which specifically stated that 'General Conditions shall not apply'. The said Notification dated 22.12.2014 was quashed vide Judgment dated 6.03.2024 by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in 'One Earth One life v. MOEF', WP (C) No. 3097 of 2016. OA No. 93/2024(CZ) Pranjal Karera Vs. Union of India & Ors.
27. That Building and constructions projects located in CPA/SPA, Eco- sensitive areas were being continued to be appraised at the State level due to the operation of the MOEF Amendment Notification dated 22.12.2014 whereby GC was made not applicable to Schedule 8, however post the quashing of the Notification dated 22.12.2014, GC is undisputedly applicable, and all such projects in Schedule 8 located in a CPA/SPA, eco- sensitive areas ought to be appraised and evaluated at the Central Level by sector specific EACs.